As a child she learnt from her father the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi which did
not abandon her when, after receiving her degree in law and a masters from Oxford,
she became a human rights lawyer and the director of Sarvodaya, the largest voluntary
organisation in Sri Lanka. At the World Social Agenda in Padua she spoke to us
about her country’s changes and, in particular, about the new role of women, often
forced to emigrate to maintain their families. In her opinion, social problems
should be a priority for the government which, on the contrary, is too busy allocating
defence budgets. In the north and east of the country, in fact, it is feared that
the country will revert to civil war between the government army, representative
of the Singhalese majority, and separatist rebels of the Tamil Tigers. In recent
weeks the violence has increased, causing many victims, including civilians, and
this is creating obstacles to the volunteers who are working on reconstruction
in the aftermath of the tsunami. Charika is also committed on this front: to respond
to the psychological needs of the victims of the tidal-wave, she has created the
programme for psycho-spiritual recovery and she collaborates with the Vishva Niketan
peace centre, where, through meditation and following the example of the Mahatma,
she helps to resolve interior and exterior conflicts.
What is the role of women in Sri Lanka?
It is very important because thousands of women contribute to the country’s economy.
Over 100 thousand work at home in the textiles and clothing industry, and 140
thousand in the Middle East, from where they send remittances that are second
place in the scale of incomes coming from foreign trade. Domestic work, and the
upbringing and education of the children, however, are still their responsibility.
Thus, recently they have found themselves faced with a great challenge: they must
fulfil their duties as wives and mothers, and at the same time they must work
outside the house to maintain the family. Singhalese society is changing. Even
the help that used to arrive from the women’s relatives is drying up, because
the enlarged family, in the past united under a single roof, is now splitting
up and the children, who are often left alone, can easily fall victim to abuses.
These are the effects of globalisation which, in Sri Lanka and in the rest of
the southern hemisphere, is not balanced, as it is in the west, by a solid social
welfare system. And the women pay a high price, being subjected to great stress.
How can these social changes be made less hard on women?
The government could, for example, help the women who have emigrated to the Middle
East by giving assistance to the relatives who are left to look after their children.
These children, without their mothers, often suffer from behavioural disorders,
and rarely do well at school. The government has a debt towards those women who
have emigrated abroad, who in the last eight years have produced more income than
the authorities have managed to obtain with the privatisation of several institutions.
In order to guarantee the safety of this work force, the ministry must monitor
emigration from Sri Lanka, registering those who leave the country. Remember that,
in the last year alone in the Middle East, many of our emigrants have undergone
violence and abuses, while 124 have actually been killed.
How are the men reacting to this change in roles?
In a patriarchal society, such as that of Sri Lanka, the men are obliged to look
after the family because the women are far away. The government must help them
face these new tasks, first and foremost the education of the children. Of a population
of 9.4 million people, some 6.2 million are children and teenagers below 18 years
of age. I believe, on the other hand, that the government’s priorities in this
moment are not social problems, but others, such as military commitment.
Are the conditions of the women and children worsening in the conflict zones
between the Singhalese army and the Tamil rebels?
In the zones controlled by the Tamils in the east and north, where the religion
is prevalently Hindu and the conflict is being fought out, women have less freedom.
In the Buddhist centre and south, on the other hand, they can go out to work without
problems. War, then, complicates things further. Fifty thousand children live
in war-torn areas, where the rebels recruit minors. Poverty strikes the whole
country, but it is more extreme in the north-east, demonstrating that in Sri Lanka
the resources are allocated unevenly. The rate at which children abandon school
is also high in the east and south; that is, in the districts which are most ignored
by the government, which is only interested in increasing the defence budget.
Which serves to fight the rebels, but also to bomb zones inhabited by civilians,
as has been happening recently….
The situation today in the north-east is a genuine disaster. I do not know how
the country can emerge from this situation. The government has never had a national
agenda that takes the overall situation into account. In the era of independence
from the English, the country was ruined by party politics. Before the elections
all the parties promise equality to the different religious and ethnic groups,
but once they come to power all their promises are broken. Every party thinks
only of itself and lacks the strong leadership necessary to see beyond their own
interests. The new president Mahinda Rajapakse has said that he will be the leader
of all the peoples of Sri Lanka, but only to create a good impression of himself.
Nationalism, which has always dominated politics in your country, is hard to
fight …
Local means of communication have exaggerated the role of nationalism, but the
population rejects this type of extremism. There are many small Tamil, Singhalese,
and Christian groups working together, but this doesn’t make the news. I believe
that the majority of the population has understood that extremism is not a good
solution for the country. The political candidates often do not respect the will
of the people, and by now have lost their trust. They are so resigned to their
fate that they do not even question the choices of their leaders. In Trincomalee,
scene of the latest violence, Tamils and Singhalese have always lived together
in harmony. It is wrong to speak of an ethnic conflict, the reasons for this war
lie elsewhere. Neither side trusts he other, so how can they build a dialogue?
As happens in personal relations, more sensitivity in understanding the other’s
point of view is necessary, but I don’t know how sensitive the army and government
can be towards the rebels and vice versa. There is still a lot of work to be done
on this terrain.