The world is global, even in its protests. That is what the demonstrations following
publication of the satirical vignettes on prophet Mohammed that triggered so much
anger throughout Islamic communities the world over have shown. African giant
Nigeria was not left immune either. Over the weekend the northern part of the
country flared up again, with clashes between Muslim and Christian communities
resulting in more than 50 victims. And they have also shown that behind the mask
of religious conflict lies a more profound malaise.
Complex problems. Some time has passed since religious conflicts in Nigeria have made the news.
It is precisely since when, in the spring of 2004, clashes broke out first in
the state of Plateau and then in the northern city of Kano, causing hundreds of
deaths (the exact number of victims was never ascertained). Now the clashes that
erupted yesterday in the city of Bauchi are added to those in Maidugui and Katsina
over the weekend, leaving more than 13 victims and forcing public authorities
to order a night curfew.
It is an explosive situation difficult to resolve, also because economic and
political problems have become mixed with the religious issues.
Land and elections. Just like two years ago, religious issues serve as a shield to hide more substantial
problems this time as well. For example, there is the issue of possession of land
amongst the various communities, an age-old problem the authorities have preferred
to shy away from and that triggered the 2004 violence in the state of Plateau.
Now added to that are political issues, such as the possible renomination of outgoing
head of state Olusegun Obasanjo at the 2007 presidential elections, which he can
obtain only if a constitutional amendment, which part of the population looks
upon with disfavour, passes. Following eight years of a government led by a Christian
president coming from the southern elite, the northern communities (mostly Muslim)
would indeed prefer a more “like-minded” head of state.
Irregular groups. In fact, in 2000 Sharia (Islamic law) was adopted in 12 of the northern states
making up the Nigerian federation. It was a decision fraught with consequences
also because, as the irony of fate would have it, the country is practically divided
in half between Muslims (50 per cent of the population) and Christians (45 per
cent). The latter did not willingly accept having to conform to Islamic law, also
because the northern states decided to apply the new provisions with uncommon
severity. Thus voluntary militias appointed to enforce Sharia, such as the Hisbah
operating in the state of Kano, were formed. Created in 2001 to cover a void of
power, these militias forbid the consumption of wines and spirits, and over the
last few months they have clashed with drivers of local motorcycle taxis who,
according to Sharia, can not carry women. The federal state has enjoined the governor
of the state of Kano several times to dismantle these irregular groups because
they allegedly serve to recruit “jihadists”. The governor has always rejected
this charge, along with the demands coming from Abuja.
A matter of priorities. One must admit that these groups of vigilantes are not peculiar to the north,
or to the Muslims. The most famous group is indeed the Bakassi Boys, who are active
in the southern state of Abia. They are more famous for harassing the population
and for cursory executions (at least a thousand, according to Amnesty International),
than for maintaining public order. Once again, the impossibility of the Nigerian
state to perform its duties, first and foremost in controlling the territory,
emerges. A fault made worse by the local politicians themselves, who subsidize
the militias and incite the various communities to violence in order to get rid
of their opponents and capitalize on the violence for electoral ends. This is
evidence of how Nigeria’s problems are more serious and structural than they may
seem. And how possession of land and political issues are much more important
than a few satirical vignettes.